Wednesday, April 6, 2016

Behavior Plans: What Works?



Oftentimes over the past few months, my second year in kindergarten, I have thought back on last year and the lessons in classroom management that I learned.

Last year I had some students who had LOTS of trouble sitting still.  (I called them "The Three Musketeers")  Among other pastimes, including wandering around to centers during instruction, they enjoyed running.  Everywhere.  Since I did not have an aide, I quickly grew frustrated having to get up from teaching and follow them around the room constantly asking them to come work, listen, stay on the carpet, line up with the rest of the class, etc.  The time I was taking to redirect them was not fair to my other students.  I realized that my normal classroom behavior plan was not going to work as well for these students, and that it was time for a tier 2 plan. 

I searched for a while for a good, editable, age appropriate behavior plan and was about ready to give up and create my own.  I FINALLY found a great one here on TpT:  Editable Behavior Plan  Easy to use, edit for our daily schedule, and age-appropriate.  Perfect.  My three enjoyed seeing how many green smileys they could earn, and even started to compete amongst themselves. 

Along with this, a brilliant teacher next door to me suggested focusing on getting them to make more positive choices.  She very kindly made me three "superhero" charts.  Every time a student makes a positive choice (in this case, we are focused on staying in an appropriate spot), they get to move their superheros up the chart.  Since I had *just* started the behavior plans, I linked it to the superheros.  Every time they earned a green smiley, they got to move their superhero up the chart (which was simply a laminated sentence strip with Velcro dots.)  Unfortunately,  I left them at my old school.  You can sort of see them at the bottom of my Dr. Seuss bulletin board here:





When they successfully moved their superhero up the chart, they got to take a break in the "busy spot."  This was a spot in the back of the classroom that had play doh, trucks, and books that they liked (one of my students was obsessed with panda bears!).  This helped so much, and I was so proud of the way the rest of my class handled the changes.  I explained the first day of implementing all this that some students need help following directions, and that we were going to try and help them do that.  No one complained about not getting to use "the spot," and they were very generous with their praises when someone choose to come sit with the rest of the class for instruction.  In the meantime, I ramped up the positive incentives for the rest of the class.  We used punch cards, table gems, and a clip chart.  My mom also offered to donate some hot chocolate, so we earned the letters in "hot chocolate" to work our way to a class hot chocolate party.  (Thanks to A Teachable Teacher for this great idea and free printable!) We earned our hot chocolate party on the 100th day of school.  That may have been slightly rigged by the teacher.  ;)

I also like the idea of "break cards."  I can't remember where I saw this, but one blogger suggested giving the student a predetermined number of "I need a break" cards, as a pass to get up and take a break from instruction.  I didn't try this yet, but it sounds easy to keep track of.

Anyway, ever since my classroom management "boot camp" of last year, as I like to call it, I've been interested in researching different ways to manage behavior.  To me it almost seems like a puzzle to figure out.  Behavior is purposeful, and what works for one kid won't work for another.  For example, once again this year, I am using my behavior chart with another student, and his needs are even different than my three students last year.  Fidget toys are working with him, which didn't work last year.  Positive reinforcement actually doesn't seem to have as much affect on him as it did last year.

Kindergartners are 5 and 6.  I get that.  They can't sit still.  I don't expect any of my students to sit for longer than fifteen to twenty minutes by mid-year, and even during that time we are getting up doing hand motions, singing, talking to partners, chanting, coming up to work on the board, etc.  I strive to incorporate developmentally-appropriate movement activities into my lessons every day.  But we also need to be willing to work with those who need an alternative arrangement.  Some teachers complain about behavior interventions taking up too much time and attention, but I'd rather try to actively problem solve, than spend my day frustrated and simply repeating a student's name over and over.  And, I think most students feel safer and calmer knowing a system is in place, rather than knowing their teacher is frustrated. 

I've had many conversations with staff and fellow teachers about the best ways to implement a tier 2 type of behavior management.  If students need to leave the rest of the group for a time-out, do they choose when they are ready to rejoin the class?  Or does the teacher?  Is it appropriate to give more incentives for seemingly expected behavior?  Should there be a balance of negative and positive consequences?  What are some of the best practices to keep in mind, especially for little ones?  I'd love to hear your thoughts on more intensive behavior management and continue the conversation!

Wednesday, April 8, 2015

Cooperative Learning- From Complaints to Compromise





Today was quite eventful.  It all started with a wasp flying around the room during our morning meeting.  So, if that gives you an idea of how the rest of the day went....well, yeah.

(I am happy to report that the wasp met its demise and I successfully removed it from the room.  It's a good thing, because we weren't going to get ANYTHING done until THAT distraction was gone.)

During the course of a recess game school assembly and introducing a new math game later this afternoon, I had a little epiphany.  My students need much more practice working in partnerships.  

I watched as three students missed an entire recess game because Student #1 was following Student #2 around trying to partner up, and Student #2 was following Student #3 around trying to partner up, and Student #3 was trying unsuccessfully to get the attention of Student #1 while avoiding every other student looking for a partner in his path.  

I watched several meltdowns during our math game (which I modeled with students and kept very simple) because So and So ALWAYS gets to go first, and So and So is CHEATING, and So and So is taking all the pink cubes, and on and on.  Sheesh.  Above almost everything else, whiners and "me first-ers" can really get under my skin. 

I called the groups together and tried to emphasize to students that we don't have any fun doing fun activities when we waste time arguing and bickering.  I realize this is part of their age and maturity level, but we REALLY need to work on it in my room.  It is partly my fault, because, as I realized today, I tend to shy away from introducing partner-based activities because of all the commotion.  We focused first on whole group behavior, then small group.  We are coming to the point where we are working well in small groups of 5 to 7.  Now, I think it is time to hone in on our partner work behaviors.  

Some of the questions I have as I reflect on moving towards this...

  • Is it better to assign partners or teach children to choose their own partners? 
  • What are some "ground rules" about working in partnerships?
  • What is an appropriate reaction from me when students approach me with a problem?  
Some of my thoughts...

  • I think I need a consistent system to start with.  Something that will be catchy and pre-posted so their attention is diverted and there are no questions about who is working with whom.  I would LOVE for them to eventually get to the point where they can nicely pick partners on their own, but I don't think we are ready for that yet.  A few months ago, a presenter suggested assigning "peanut butter and jelly" partners for Read to Partner time.  I went to my favorite store (Dollar Tree) and they did not have the peanut butter and jelly cutouts, but I found mustard and ketchup cutouts.  I just need to get magnets on the back, work out a partnership list, and get them posted.  My list will be based on both academic and behavior considerations; aligning students who are at similar academic levels and who complement each other's personalities.  Besides, "work with your ketchup partner" just sounds so much better than "work with so and so."  :)
  • Ground rules...my kiddies do really well with anchor charts that they discuss with me, help me make and can refer back to.  Actually, our behavioral anchor charts are more often used than our academic anchor charts.  So, I guess we will have to have a class meeting about working with partners.  We'll discuss how:  
    • You don't have to be with that person forever.  
    • Strategies for deciding who goes first (i.e., roll a dice and go with the highest number)
    • No angry voices or snatching,  Provide appropriate alternatives instead, "Please pass me..." etc.
    • Choices for what to do if there is a problem (work it out, or work alone) 
    • Ask "Does it matter?"  Pink cubes don't matter.  Winning and losing doesn't really matter.  Learning and having fun DOES matter! 
  • If the above has been done, then, unless the problem is life-threatening, I think my reaction will  hopefully be....nothing.  I can redirect their attention to the chart, suggest an alternative response, and ask them what they will choose to do.  
Time to go off and plan some good partner-based measurement activities!